Saturday, August 22, 2015

From the Illustrators Partnership: Copyright Office Letters Posted

Originally posted Friday, August 21, 2015 by the Illustrators Partnership of America (IPA). The following is courtesy of IPA.

The Copyright Office has posted the responses to its Visual Arts Notice of Inquiry.


http://copyright.gov/policy/visualworks/comments/

They say they "received a large volume of initial comments," and unlike previous letters, which they always posted individually, these have been posted in Adobe PDF Portfolio view.

The Copyright Office recommends you download the files rather than viewing in a browser. 

© 2015 Don Arday.
Go to the link above and you'll see 7 PDF’s. The first, captioned "Direct Initial Comments" contains 358 letters that the Copyright Office regards as directly responsive to the 5 questions they posed about current copyright law. The other letters are available in one of the 6 PDF’s titled "General Initial Comments," and contain 2,244 letters.

Download the PDF’s and open them. Be patient: this could take several minutes. An error message may pop up: ignore it and proceed. 

When the file opens, it may appear to contain only one letter. Go to the menu at the upper left of the PDF portfolio file and click on "Files." This will open a column with hundreds of names along the left hand side of the window.

The letters are listed alphabetically by the author's first name or organization name. If the letter you're looking for is not in the "Direct" comments PDF, look for it alphabetically in one of the remaining 6.

(Informed Illustrator Editor's Note: You have the opportunity to reply to comments made in the letters submitted or to write additional letters.)

Reply Comments are due October 1, 2015

American and foreign artists can both submit their letters online here.

Please Be Advised:

"The Office intends to post the written comments and documentary evidence on its website in the form in which they are received. Parties should keep in mind that any private, confidential, or personally identifiable information appearing in their comment will be accessible to the public."

Special Note to Foreign Artists:

If you are submitting from outside the US, under "State," please scroll down to the bottom and select "Non U.S.A. Location." 

Read the Copyright Office Notice of Inquiry and Extension of Comment Period.

This will be an opportunity for you to either endorse those comments you agree with or object to those you don't. Or if you missed the first deadline, this will be a second chance to weigh in.

We hope everyone will review as many of these letters as possible and consider responding.

-- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner 
    for the Board of the Illustrators Partnership

Please post or forward this artist alert to any interested party. 



Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Urgent: Orphan Works Letters Due July 23: Protect Your Ownership of Copyright

Originally posted Wednesday, July 1, 2015 by the Illustrators Partnership of America (IPA). The following is courtesy of IPA.

The Return of Orphan Works Part 1: The Next Great Copyright Act


For more than a year Congress has been holding hearings for the drafting of a brand new US Copyright Act. At its heart is the return of Orphan Works.

© 2015 Don Arday.
Twice, Orphan Works Acts have failed to pass Congress because of strong opposition from visual artists, spearheaded by the Illustrators Partnership.

Because of this, the Copyright Office has now issued a special call for letters regarding the role of visual art in the coming legislation.

Therefore we're asking all artists concerned with retaining the rights to their work to join us in writing.  

Deadline: July 23, 2015

You can submit letters online to the Copyright Office here.
Read the Copyright Office Notice of Inquiry.
Read the 2015 Orphan Works and Mass Digitization Report.

Here are the Basic Facts

  "The Next Great Copyright Act" would replace all existing copyright law.
  It would void our Constitutional right to the exclusive control of our work.
  It would "privilege" the public's right to use our work.
  It would "pressure" you to register your work with commercial registries.
  It would "orphan" unregistered work.
  It would make orphaned work available for commercial infringement by "good faith" infringers.
  It would allow others to alter your work and copyright these "derivative works" in their own names.
  It would affect all visual art: drawings, paintings, sketches, photos, etc.; past, present and future; published and unpublished; domestic and foreign.

The Demand for Copyright "Reform" 

The demand for copyright "reform" has come from large Internet firms and the legal scholars allied with them. Their business models involve supplying the public with access to other people's copyrighted work. Their problem has been how to do this legally and without paying artists.

The "reforms" they've proposed would allow them to stock their databases with our pictures. This would happen either by forcing us to hand over our images to them as registered works, or by harvesting unregistered works as orphans and copyrighting them in their own names as "derivative works."

The Copyright Office acknowledges that this will cause special problems for visual artists but concludes that we should still be subject to orphan works law.

The "Next Great Copyright Act" would go further than previous Orphan Works Acts. The proposals under consideration include:

1.) The Mass Digitization of our intellectual property by corporate interests.
2.) Extended Collective Licensing, a form of socialized licensing that would replace voluntary business agreements between artists and their clients.
3.) A Copyright Small Claims Court to handle the flood of lawsuits expected to result from orphan works infringements.

In Your Letter to the Copyright Office 

It's important that lawmakers be told that our copyrights are our source of income because lobbyists and corporation lawyers have "testified" that once our work has been published it has virtually no further commercial value and should therefore be available for use by the public.

So when writing, please remember:
•  It's important that you make your letter personal and truthful.
•  Keep it professional and respectful.
•  Explain that you're an artist and have been one for x number of years.
•  Briefly list your educational background, publications, awards, etc. 
•  Indicate the field(s) you work in.
•  Explain clearly and forcefully that for you, copyright law is not an abstract legal issue, but the basis on which your business rests.
•  Our copyrights are the products we license.
•  This means that infringing our work is like stealing our money.
•  It's important to our businesses that we remain able to determine voluntarily how and by whom our work is used.
•  Stress that your work does NOT lose its value upon publication.
•  Instead everything you create becomes part of your business inventory.
•  In the digital era, inventory is more valuable to artists than ever before.

If You are NOT a Professional Artist

•  Define your specific interest in copyright, and give a few relevant details.
•  You might want to stress that it's important to you that you determine how and by whom your work is used.
•  You might wish to state that even if you're a hobbyist, you would not welcome someone else monetizing your work for their own profit without your knowledge or consent.

-- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner 
    for the Board of the Illustrators Partnership

The Illustrators Partnership has filed multiple papers with the Copyright Office regarding this issue. You can download them from the Copyright Office website:

Remedies for Small Copyright Claims 
January 17, 2012

Orphan Works and Mass Digitization 
Initial Comments February 3, 2013

Orphan Works and Mass Digitization 
Reply Comments, March 6, 2013

Orphan Works and Mass Digitization 
 Additional Comments, May 21, 2014

POSTED BY ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP OF AMERICA AT 9:49 PM0 COMMENTS http://www.blogger.com/img/icon18_email.gif